RE: [GD-Windows] VC.NET 'Optimization'

[Grills, J. <jg...@so...>]

Maybe on some compilers, but it's not guaranteed.  The order of argument
evaluation to functions is not specified by the C++ standard - it's left
up to the implementations.

j

-----Original Message-----
From: gam...@li...
[mailto:gam...@li...] On Behalf Of
Lewin, Gareth
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:02 PM
To: gam...@li...
Subject: RE: [GD-Windows] VC.NET 'Optimization'

I fail to see why this worries you, the optimiser is making a (valid)
assumption about your code, and generating the fastest sequence it can.

As a side note, just flip the order of your params to printf, that
should give you want you want.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: gam...@li...
[mailto:gam...@li...] On Behalf Of
yogiwp
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:52 AM
To: gam...@li...
Subject: Re: [GD-Windows] VC.NET 'Optimization'

> ----------------------------------------------------
>     timer.Restart();
>     printf( "time=3D%f, result=3D%d\n", timer.GetElapsed(), =
fibonacci(42)=20
> );
> ----------------------------------------------------