Re: [GD-General] Minor rant - cross-platform configuration
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: Colin F. <cp...@ea...> - 2002-11-06 13:51:59
|
2002 November 6th Wednesday > > This is something that should have been mostly figured out years ago, > > and yet everyone rolls their own. > [...] > > Anyway, I'm writing a single generic header file that's going to be > > used by all of our ANSI C libraries, > > You asked the question, and then indirectly answered it yourself. The wheel > was invented a long time ago, but there are hundreds of different wheels in > the market today. I might be wrong here (I'm still recovering from Election Night depression), but I thought Brian was offering to end the "reinventing the wheel" pattern by posting a definitive header file that should satisfy the needs of most cross-platform developers. The reason these devlopers "rolled their own" header files was because, I suppose, a standard header file had never been created or published. Just as the initiative that led to the Standard Template Library (STL) now saves many developers from having to make the same basic containers and algorithms, perhaps GOSH will save developers from having to enter the world of arcane compiler variables and directives. Sure, there will be people that want custom headers, just as some people need to avoid STL. Anyhow, as far as having "hundreds of different wheels in the market today", it's not because consumers desire variety. No, it's because "The Man" knows that open standards and compatability might mean that His products actually need to compete for consumer's cash. "The Man" is not interested in the welfare of the consumer beyond the ability to produce more things to be consumed, and the ability to buy stuff (preferably invisible stuff, like derivative stocks and phone sex). So, we have the Sony wheel, with its memory stick, funky cables, and wacky batteries. Then there's the Microsoft wheel, which requires you to get a ".NET Passport", a "hotmail" account and spam, and always keep your wheel online so it can call home. The MSN 8.0 wheel is just as good as the AOL 8.0 wheel. The Cingular wheel allows you to drive around a little more next month if you didn't drive around so much this month, like that's an excuse to switch from some other wheel. Verizon has a wireless wheel, but to have any fun with it you have to get a Microsoft wheel and pay money for "Get It Now!". (AT&T also has a wireless wheel, but anyone can mess with their own wheel.) RealNetworks has the "Real One" wheel, which gathers information about where the wheel has been, a lot like the Microsoft Media Player wheel does. GameCube, PS2, and XBox wheels don't work together at all; you have to choose where you want to roll, unless you're willing to buy all three wheels. For all the wheels mentioned above, you should buy the wheel you see the most on television, especially if the wheel is shown next to a popular but totally unrelated wheel. Vote for the wheel that will lower taxes, and then freak out when hospitals, schools, parks, libraries, roads, homeless shelters, clinics, fire stations, and police stations start closing. Forget about domestic issues and the economy, and expand programs to "defend" our wheels against vague threats halfway around the globe, without the support of most wheels in the civilized world. The true dream of "The Man" is to create an attractive wheel whose operation is completely secret, and then achieve market saturation by dumping these wheels all over the world for free (or far below cost), and then license and lease the ability to make the wheels roll. Only through partnership with "The Man" can you hope to compete with others who are already partners with "The Man". Eventually, when a partner of "The Man" becomes really successful, "The Man" will assimilate the essence of the partner just to eliminate the gap between "The Man" and pure profit. That's the Amazing(r) Story(c) of "The Man(sm) and His Wheels(tm), LLP", all rights reserved, patent pending, registered trademark, copyright, etc. If you do not agree to the terms of this e-mail, OR CRAZY LEGAL PARAGRAPHS WRITTEN IN ALL UPPERCASE LETTERS, or any of the 1000 paragraphs in the EULA that you couldn't possibly have read in the 1.3 seconds before you finally preceive and immediately press the "I Agree" button, then return all materials in the original packaging to the manufacturer for a "full refund"(*), in the form of a voucher that allows you to purchase some of our other products. Please allow 8 to 200 weeks for delivery. Not responsible for goods damaged or lost in the mail. Before returning any product, you must notify us in writing, and you must register online with a telemarketing database. You must send the original store receipt, a notarized affadavit, a self-addressed stamped envelope, tax returns, and medical records. If, God forbid, there's actually competition in this domain, we will charge an early termination fee when you finally wake up and switch to a better product. If you fail an arbitrary credit check, we'll increase the cost of the product by 50% as a convenience to you, and this amount is non-refundable even if you return the product. [ ] I Disagree, even though I drove all the way to the computer store, paid $400 for this software, have a strong desire to do something productive with the software, and already did most of the installation steps. There was a tiny clause in the EULA that I just cannot accept, despite the fact that the overwhelming elements of the program do just what I want. Sure, the next best software out there may be used by only 2% of the market, but I'm willing to enter obscurity and alienation if it means that GiantCorporation won't make me make yet another concession in my privacy. I know that eventually the OS will fundamentally invade my privacy, and checkboxes will revert to allowing full disclosure, and minor incidental software upgrades will totally change the agreements, but I'll take a silly stand against these things even when the federal government will let GiantCorporation do whatever it wants anyhow. [ ] I Agree. Okay, I didn't really read the EULA. I trust that GiantCorporation will do what's best for me. I kind of like WWW sites that greet me by name. The targeted advertising and e-mail is just great. Actually, it's kind of reassuring to know that GiantCorporation is checking if I have any pirated music, images, or software on my computer, and checking my documents for any anti-establishment talk. When ObscureCorp enforces an all-encompassing patent on "interactive software", I'll automatically be billed for royalties. In general, renting is better than buying; it keeps me from owning things, and I get to spend money on an ongoing basis and gives me a thrill of imagining what might happen if I lost my job. Maybe I can save some money if I leased some of my software on an hourly basis. I'm hoping that GiantCorporation can devise a closed system on my own desktop, monitoring all files, and managing my life -- like I'm part of a giant club, where everyone likes the same music, movies, video games, and GiantCorporation's version of the news. It's easier when we're all the same! I hope GiantCorporation makes us all the same, of a single mind, at equilibrium, in perfect harmony with GiantCorporation. Yes, I Agree! --- Colin cp...@ea... |