RE: [GD-Windows] Visual C++ .Net

[Wayne C. <wc...@re...>]

>   M$'s reasoning makes perfect business sense. Even though I'd be
> interested to see PTS supported, I can see where they are coming from.
> Also, I think most developers using C++ simply don't have a clue what
> partial template specialisation is and don't really care about it
> either.

Ahh but is that because they don't know what it is they're missing, or
what's it's useful for. Or is it simply because PTS is an esoteric addition
to the language even to people who keep asking for it?

Although it'd be *nice* I've managed okies without it so far :)

FWIW I've used VS.NET beta2 at home since I bought WinXP (yeh, sorry, but I
kinda like MS... lots ;). I find it very nice, although generally it feels
*heavier* to use it's an improvement over VS6 in all areas. By only gripe is
that the document tabs don't work as well as wndtabs for VS6 but that's a
minor one. :)

Wayne
-Virus scanned and cleared ok