Re: [GD-General] Pro-IP bill passed the house: User-created
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: George W. <ge...@ap...> - 2008-05-27 16:45:16
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 17:24:13 +0100, "Crosbie Fitch" <cr...@cy...> wrote: > You say the artist would be better served working on commission for business > companies. All I'm exploring is the same thing, but with the company > disintermediated. So, instead of accepting a commission from one business > company, you accept one from all or any of your audience (which may well > include several business companies that might outbid other members of your > audience). The difference is though, that instead of the company asserting > their copyright over the work, it is neutralised such that anyone who > receives it is free to use it as they wish (a la GPL). So why should a company spend money on a commission when instead they could just wait and get it for free? -- Enjoy, George Warner, Schizophrenic Optimization Scientist Apple Developer Technical Support (DTS) |