Re: [GaMD-discuss] Peptide Gaussian Accelerated MD - Question about Simulation Set-up
Brought to you by:
yinglongmiao
|
From: Carol K H. <ha...@nc...> - 2026-01-31 15:55:38
|
Hi Yinglong, Thanks for getting back to Arpan, It would be great if you could look at our approach and give us some guidance. Would you be amenable, perhaps , to talking with us in next week or so and to chat? I hope that you are not too impacted by the weather situation . I just saw a few snowflakes. Best wishes, Carol On 1/30/2026 4:52 PM, Miao, Yinglong wrote: > Hi Arpan, > > Thanks for your interest in Pep-GaMD! > > Yes, it would be great if you can share your simulation input > parameter files and probably mdout file for the Pep-GaMD > equilibration. We can then look into the issue in more detail. > > Best regards, > Yinglong > > Yinglong Miao, Ph.D. > Associate Professor > Department of Pharmacology > Computational Medicine Program > Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center > University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill > Tel: 1-919-962-5696 > http://miaolab.org > > Editor-in-Chief > /npj Drug Discovery/ > https://www.nature.com/npjdrugdiscov > >> On Jan 30, 2026, at 11:02 AM, Arpan Tapdiya <agt...@nc...> wrote: >> >> Hello Prof Miao, >> >> My name is Arpan Tapdiya, and I am a PhD student in Professor Carol >> Hall’s research group in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular >> Engineering at North Carolina State University. Our group designs >> short peptides for biosensor and therapeutic applications. To do so, >> we have developed our Monte-Carlo based Peptide Binding Design >> Algorithm (PepBD), and we use molecular dynamics (MD) and enhanced >> sampling to quantify peptide-target interactions. >> >> I am currently applying Pep-GaMD to study binding dynamics for our >> designed 10-residue peptides interacting with a ~240-residue protein >> target. I set up simulations following the Pep-GaMD protocol from >> your paper <https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0021399> (with a larger solvent >> box for this system) and explored different boost settings, including >> varying σ0P and σ0D from ~2 to 6 kcal/mol. >> >> While the peptide behaves as expected by dissociating and exploring >> bound/unbound regions, during the GaMD equilibration stage (when the >> boost is applied to the target protein + solvent in the dual-boost >> scheme), the target protein begins to lose its native secondary >> structure. The target has four α-helices at the start of the >> simulation, but shortly after the Gaussian boost is applied, it >> progressively unfolds and appears intrinsically disordered. This >> occurs even at relatively small boost settings. Notably, the system >> remains stable in conventional MD without the GaMD boost. >> >> The target structure is taken from the Protein Data Bank, and the >> peptide was designed through our simulation workflow. >> >> I would be very grateful for your guidance on the following: >> >> 1. >> >> What are the most common causes of target protein unfolding in >> Pep-GaMD/GaMD runs? >> >> 2. >> >> In your experience, can unfolding indicate that the boost >> potential is effectively too aggressive for the system even when >> σ0P/σ0D are set low? If so, what parameter adjustments or >> protocol changes would you recommend? >> >> 3. >> >> Are there recommended strategies to maintain target stability in >> Pep-GaMD without adding additional constraints, while still >> allowing meaningful peptide binding/unbinding sampling? >> >> If helpful, I can share the simulation setup details and the >> necessary files. >> >> Thank you very much for your time and for developing and sharing >> GaMD/Pep-GaMD. This method is extremely valuable for the types of >> peptide systems we study, and we will be thankful for any help! >> >> Sincerely, >> Arpan >> >> >> -- >> Arpan Tapdiya >> Graduate Student >> Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering >> North Carolina State University > -- Carol K. Hall, Worley H. Clark, Jr. Distinguished University Professor Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905, USA 919-515-3571(phone);ha...@nc... https://carolkhall.wordpress.ncsu.edu |