Re: [Gambas-user] Collection key
Brought to you by:
gambas
From: Caveat <Ga...@ca...> - 2011-10-12 19:42:34
|
And the other way around...as you also talked about "the last 8 characters"... DIM coll AS NEW Collection DIM value AS String coll.Add("A", "A12345678") coll.Add("B", "B12345678") coll.Add("C", "C12345678") coll.Add("D", "12345678") FOR EACH value IN coll PRINT "Value: " & value & " Key: " & coll.key & " Value of coll[" & coll.key & "] : " & coll[coll.key] NEXT Value: A Key: A12345678 Value of coll[A12345678] : A Value: B Key: B12345678 Value of coll[B12345678] : B Value: C Key: C12345678 Value of coll[C12345678] : C Value: D Key: 12345678 Value of coll[12345678] : D On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:37 +0200, Caveat wrote: > DIM coll AS NEW Collection > DIM value AS String > coll.Add("A", "12345678A") > coll.Add("B", "12345678B") > coll.Add("C", "12345678C") > coll.Add("D", "12345678") > FOR EACH value IN coll > PRINT "Value: " & value & " Key: " & coll.key & " Value of > coll[" & coll.key & "] : " & coll[coll.key] > NEXT > > I don't get what the problem is. In both Gambas2 and Gambas3 I get the > expected result: > > Value: A Key: 12345678A Value of coll[12345678A] : A > Value: B Key: 12345678B Value of coll[12345678B] : B > Value: C Key: 12345678C Value of coll[12345678C] : C > Value: D Key: 12345678 Value of coll[12345678] : D > > Am I missing the obvious here, or is this affecting only a certain > version of Gambas or a specific platform? > > Kind regards, > Caveat > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > Gam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user |