Re: [Gambas-user] External library variable

[M. Cs. <moh...@gm...>]

"I really don't care about the syntax."
But I do! I'm really appreciated with the work of the Gambas team, but
I'd like to express that the synthax is a quite important thing:
1. Compatibility with G2 projects
2. Time, a lot of times to spend hunting to find the changes, and the
solutions for the methods you've used just like that in G2 and now in
G3 not.
A simple example: in G2 there was enough to write a function in order
to have things printed out, now in G3 there are at least 2-3
subroutines for the same task.
IMHO this isn't as good a strategy. I don't care what lies behind the
synthax, but it's not really efficient thing to learn the language
over and over.
Once again, Gambas is GREAT, but it would be better to leave the
synthax unchanged.
Csaba

2011/6/29, Gary D Walborn <gwa...@gm...>:
> Benoit,
>
>    You come through again!  I really don't care about the syntax.  I'm vary
> pleased that there is a mechanism to do this.  I was afraid I'd have to
> write a wrapper to duplicate the original library calls and add accessor
> function for the variables.  If the system call works, it will save me a ton
> of work!  Thank you SO MUCH for all your help.
>
> --
> Gary D. Walborn
> gwa...@gm...
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gam...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>