From: mike <mi...@re...> - 2000-09-23 21:36:54
|
The memory "problem" is the same as in mozilla itself with how top reports it. Because ozilla (and galeon because it uses mozilla) uses threads this confuses top/gtop. So to work out memory actually being used divide memory by number of galeon processes > I tried today galeon-0.7.5-1 just to see if I can from Netscape > and find somehting leaner/faster. > > I'm fairly impressed with Galeon stability. It rendered fine all > (some quite complex) page I tried, and in particular is much better > on showing international Russian pages (it is a pain to get Netscape > to show cyrillic on buttons and in input areas). > The feel is a bit strange, but maybe even nice. > > However, I was not impressed with neither speed, nor memory usage. > It is definitely does nto feel faster than Netscape (although > I'm on the fast connection, and I sometimes find it faster > to reload page than to read from disk cache !, as a note - as I hear > my hard drive, seems that Galeon is using it much less than Netscape) > > Also, memory. Right now on my machine Galeon occupies 24Mb, while > Netscape-4.75 (with browser and mail composer open) - 18.5 Mb > With time Netscape sometimes go to around 32MB, but I so Galeon > at 34 Mb ! This is definitely not 'lean' (which, unfortunately, often > is a problem of Gnome applications), especialy for reduced feature list. > > Which means, I guess, that it is time for optimization stage ! > > Best reagrds, Dmitri Pogosyan > > > _______________________________________________ > Galeon-user mailing list > Gal...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/galeon-user > -- Microsoft(tm) - a particularly nasty virus affecting majority of PC's Vaccinate with Linux ASAP!! |