Re: [Galeon-user] Open-frame-in... functions don't.

[Karsten M. S. <km...@ix...>]

on Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:54:18PM +0000, Crispin Flowerday (gnome@flowerda=
y.cx) wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 22:10 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Galeon 1.3.18-1.1 (Debian testing/unstable x86).
> >=20
> > The context menu "View frame" functions which AFAICT are supposed to
> > open the current frame:
> >=20
> >     "Open Frame"                    In current tab
> >     "Open Frame in new tab"         In new tab
> >     "Open Frame in new window"      In new window
> >=20
> > ...don't.  Best I seem to get is a page reload.
> >=20
> > In fact, there's no way to tell what the URL of the current frame is
> > other than reading the document source and guessing.
>=20
> There is a bug at the moment, I believe you first need to left click on
> a frame before right clicking to get the context menu:
>=20
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D149566

I'm somewhat glad to hear that, because I *swear* I was having the
problem.  It appears to be a bit of a Heisenbug.

One possible conflating factor:  I'm running a current 3.1.17 Galeon
session (up since Dec 8), but 3.1.18 is the currently installed version.
I've seen some oddments in the past in Firefox when it got upgraded from
underneath.
=20
> If you don't left click, then the currently focused document is the
> toplevel one, so those frame operation act on the entire page, not just
> the frame you clicked in.

I'd right, left, middle, and in-ways-not-describable-in-a-family-mailing-
list clicked the page(s) in question.
=20
> I'll see if I can fix it right now :-)

Two sites I'm looking at, and one may be coded so's not to use standard
frames:

    http://www.sconsig.com   (standard frames)
    http://www.madville.com  (iframe?)

In the case of Madville, link to one of the referenced stories, e.g.:

    http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=3D86878&t=3D7

I *think* the problem there may be some sort of enforced framing.
Which, incidentally, is really maddening.  Fortunatly, well, it's
Madville.  And of course, hardly worth reading.


Peace.

--=20
Karsten M. Self <km...@ix...>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    You know, maybe FSF should just rebrand emacs as the hurd and stick
    a fork() in it...
    - Karsten M. Self, on linux-elitists