Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] IPSec Support

[Oleg <xs...@ma...>]

LC > Yes, it is klips that provides the ipsec devices. On both 2.4 and 2.6.
LC > Yes, KAME is so Stoopid(tm) to neglect the needs of firewalls.

Yes, current KAME realization has less features and more bugs when comparing 
with KLIPS. I have some strong examples for those, who not believe. Presence 
of ipsecX interfaces helps greately for searching errors in VPN configuration 
and firewalling.

I think KAME will never be better than KLIPS.