Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Headers in Rulesets
Brought to you by:
mikehorn
From: <dum...@gm...> - 2006-04-26 17:24:45
|
Guten Tag Vadim Kurland ?, am Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 um 16:45 schrieben Sie: > On Apr 25, 2006, at 12:14 AM, dum...@gm... wrote: >> Hi! >> >> i am working with a checkpointrNG for a few days now and i must say it >> does outperform firewall builder in only very few areas. There is only >> one thing i am missing. The grouping and collapsing / expanding of >> rules with headers. The colors are a great thing but don't help when >> you have many and i mean many rules. So nameable headers would be a >> great thing which could be added. > this is a great feature, no doubt, but it won't make it into 2.1. > I'll work on this for the next major release. so 3.0? ok so we have to buy some editional licences or is there some kind of update discount? >> Also an option to change the default behavior of drag & drop >> objects should be changed to copy not to move or at least should be >> configurable. > you can copy with drag and drop if you hold down Ctrl key when you > click on the object you want to drag Thanks! but no plans making this a default option which is changeable in the setup dialog? >> We ordered 3 copies of fwb for windows yesterday after excessive >> testing and we are looking forward to the release of 2.1! >> Keep up your great work! > thanks > --vk > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen dum...@gm... mailto:dum...@gm... |