Re: [fuse-devel] Re: [PATCH] Reduce branching in fuse_ll_process()

[Bjorn L. <bjo...@gm...>]

just a quick question, regarding the aspect of increased efficiency:
I would have thought a c compiler would anyway make this case statement int=
o

a quick memory offset jump if the labels of the case statement are
consecutive?
Which then is not inefficient after all?

bjorn


On 3/15/06, Miklos Szeredi <mi...@sz...> wrote:
>
> > This patch replaces the 30+ cases switch statement in fuse_ll_process()
> > with indirect function calls. Besides increased efficiency I think it
> > helps maintainability & readability too.
> >
> > In order to implement a uniform interface I had to refactor some do_*()
> > functions and defer casting/parameter extraction - other than that it's
> > pretty straightforward.
>
> Looks good, applied.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> fuse-devel mailing list
> fus...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel
>