From: Csaba H. <csa...@cr...> - 2006-03-13 01:42:13
|
On 2006-03-10, Victor Porton <po...@ex...> wrote: > Yes, both old FUSE (executable FS) and LUFS (library) FS approaches are > to be considered not appropriate. The right thing is the combined > approach with mapping between each other. While it's true that currently FUSE is committed to the fs-as-executable approach, what prevents you in writing your fs in the way you sketched? A library at its core, and a sample application where the respective initializator method makes a call to fuse_main()... wouldn't that work out? Regards, Csaba |