|
From: Valient G. <vg...@po...> - 2005-09-29 18:47:46
|
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 13:57, Mathew Binkley wrote: > I have tested three test cases: > > * "New" kernel (32.0.1) v. "Old" (15.0.4), both with GPFS: both fail > * "New" kernel", both with GPFS but one without AFS: both fail > * "New" kernel with GPFS v "New" without: with fails, without passes This is interesting. When you don't build GPFS into the kernel, then it=20 works? > Would anyone be willing to take a look at this for me? If so, email me > and I'll set up an account for you. I could take a look (I'm the encfs author), but it sounds like there won't = be=20 anything I can do at the encfs level. Sounds like it may be a kernel-level= =20 issue. Valient |