From: Miklos S. <mi...@sz...> - 2005-02-22 15:18:11
|
> Hmm. This may be a problem for our usage. I understand that without > an inode-based FUSE, this can't be fixed 100%, but are there things > (aside from making large changes to FUSE) we can do to make it as > unlikely as possible? Or are the changes to FUSE not that large? It should be fairly easy to do by letting the cache in libfuse grow unlimited. If you can tolerate this (e.g. the number of files in the filesystem is limited to about ten-twenty thousand), then I think there's no problem. So? Miklos |