Re: [fuse-devel] problem with getattr calls in latest fuse 2-9-3

[kingsmasher1 <raj...@gm...>]

Thanks a lot Miklos, that was immensely helpful, and exactly what we were
looking for.
I can download the libfuse using git and that will be sufficient for my dev
environment for compilation.

However, for deploying it to our environment i can see the fuse RPMs are
2.9.3 as the latest available, and i don't think it has the highlevel
readdir_plus available yet. When can we expect that any clue?

Also, i can see the latest fuse revision that is included in RPMs is 8
months old (we use SuSE):
https://build.opensuse.org/package/revisions/filesystems/fuse

Can you please suggest something regarding this.

Thanks in advance.


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Miklos Szeredi [via Fuse] <
ml-...@n3...> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Raj Kumar Sanpui
> <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=12037&i=0>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Miklos,
> >
> > If you see, the fuse_lowlevel has a totally different parameter sets,
> and
> > requires different way of initialization unlike on the high level sets
> of
> > APIs which just requires calling fuse_main( ) and populating the
> callbacks
> > of "struct fuse_operations".  Or in other words, the high level one, is
> > filename based, and the "fuse_lowlevel" is inode number based. Our
> entire
> > code is, based on filename convention and porting it to "fuse_lowlevel"
> just
> > for one API, might not be a very feasible option at the moment.
> >
> > Thus, it's my humble request, if we can have a similar readdir_plus API
> on
> > the high level counterpart too. Please let me know your views, as to or
> when
> > we can expect that.
>
> Please check the latest libfuse git tree.  It has a solution that I
> think will meet your needs.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to
> Perforce.
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
> Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and
> the
> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
> _______________________________________________
> fuse-devel mailing list
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=12037&i=1>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://fuse.996288.n3.nabble.com/problem-with-getattr-calls-in-latest-fuse-2-9-3-tp12009p12037.html
>  To unsubscribe from problem with getattr calls in latest fuse 2-9-3, click
> here<http://fuse.996288.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=12009&code=cmFqLmt1bWFyLnNhbnB1aUBnbWFpbC5jb218MTIwMDl8MTUwNTg3MDEzOA==>
> .
> NAML<http://fuse.996288.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: http://fuse.996288.n3.nabble.com/problem-with-getattr-calls-in-latest-fuse-2-9-3-tp12009p12047.html
Sent from the Fuse mailing list archive at Nabble.com.