Re: [fuse-devel] Fuse performance over ext4 performance

[Sebastian P. <seb...@pi...>]

On 10/20/2011 06:09 PM, Samuel Gallard wrote:
> I used fusexmp.c (web.mit.edu/~ecprice/fuse-2.7.0/example/fusexmp.c) with 
> the fuse version 2.8.6 which just permits to replace a normal file system.
> 
> Did anyone ever succeed to obtain almost the same performance in reading and
> writing with Fuse ?

Keep in mind that a stackeable file system (as in your case) always adds
some overhead.  Also, ext4 runs in kernel-space only while fusexmp runs
part in user space.

Best,



Sebastian