Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

[Jean-Pierre A. <jea...@wa...>]

Hi,

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> I suggest I port Miklos patch to fuse-lite soon,
>> and delay the low-level case (and microsecond
>> precision) until January. Does that suit your needs ?
>>      
> Thanks. Sounds good. I'm not using ntfs-3g actually, I just bridged the
> bug report on lkml to others. Eric?

Attached is a proposed patch for selective update
of timestamps in ntfs-3g (based on the release
candidate version ntfs-3g-2009.11.14AC.2).

It includes the backport of Miklos's patch posted
yesterday to fuse-lite. As a matter of fact fuse-lite
is needed, because I do not know how to make this
compile with unpatched fuse.

Note : this does not yet include  sub-second precision.

Regards

Jean-Pierre