From: Stef B. <st...@gm...> - 2009-11-16 14:35:21
|
Fuse unionfs? Why? My module can do something special with symbolic links (to directories), and can make them look like a directory, fooling the user and the system. This way I can make it look like local resources like an mounted usb device is also mounted by this fuse module, and the same for network resources Samba/Windows shares , mounted by the automounter, but "mirrored" by this module. I do not know any unionfs which does that. OK, correct me when I'm wrong, every fs mounted has it's own numbers, and a number can appear more than once when comparing two fs's. That explains a lot. I do not have to use the option use_ino then to make things consistent. Stef 2009/11/16 Goswin von Brederlow <gos...@we...>: > Stef Bon <st...@gm...> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I've created fuse-workspace, a fuse module which mirrors the contents >> of ~/.fuse/bind. More info: >> >> http://linux.bononline.nl/linux/fuse-workspace/ >> >> I'm using this module with the paramaters -o allow_root,use_ino. >> The last parameter makes FUSE use the original ino. Now, because this >> is an overlay >> fs, the ino's become available on more than one place in the tree. Is >> this ok, or causing problems? >> Earlier I had a problem with find, which gave a warning about (no)leaf. >> >> Stef > > Why not use unionfs fuse? > > Inodes are specific to a filesystem. Every filesystem has an inode 1 > for example. Also hardlinks have the same inode within a > filesystem. So that really should not cause any problems. > > MfG > Goswin > |