From: Szabolcs S. <sz...@nt...> - 2008-10-14 12:41:29
|
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I still got qualms about this ioctl thing. One is the security > aspect, but that could be dealt with. The other is that I really > really don't want people to start implementing new custom ioctls for > their filesystems, as I think that way lies madness. We could limit > ioctls to CUSE and that would be fine with me. Or for non-CUSE users > we could enforce the "standard" format where the type and length is > encoded in the command number. Is this enough to support the most useful/requested file system ioctls, like FIEMAP? Thanks, Szaka -- NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org |