Re: [fuse-devel] Is fuse suitable for UDF packet writing implementation?

[Luis F. <lui...@gm...>]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Szabolcs Szakacsits <sz...@nt...> wrote:
> I don't know sure its portability, usually they are very similar. We have
> found that Linux FUSE is the most reliable (no known problem). The OS X,
> FreeBSD and Solaris FUSE ports have problems but they seem to be in the
> kernels. No news from NetBSD (it either works fine or not many ntfs-3g
> users).

NetBSD has it's own filesystem in userspace mechanism called PUFFS and
a library called librefuse that translates fuse api into puffs api. I
am not sure,
but I think that this interface is compatible only with the FUSE high level
interface.

Details: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/puffs/

Best Regards

-- 
Luis Otavio de Colla Furquim
Não alimente os pingos
Don't feed the tribbles
http://www.furquim.org/chironfs/