From: Franco B. <fr...@fu...> - 2007-03-06 01:46:34
|
Sorry, thought 2.6.3 was a kernel version! On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 20:27 -0500, John Muir wrote: > Franco Broi wrote: > > Should 2.6.10 + FUSE 2.5.2 work? This is what I already have and last > > time I tried it, it didn't work. > > > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 23:39 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > >> John Muir reported that 2.6.3 works OK. 2.6.17 should be fine. The > >> fuse kernel module in the 2.6.3 package is basically the same as the > >> one in 2.6.20. > >> > Franco, > > You need version 2.6.x of the FUSE kernel module for NFS exports to be > more reliable (not lock-up), so you might as well use version 2.6.3. > Note that the issues described in the README.NFS still apply. > > If your file-system is implemented using the low-level interface > (fuse_lowlevel.h), and you apply my patches (previously posted) which > enable a few more NFS export operations, and implement those new > operations, then you can also eliminate the ESTALE errors resulting when > the NFS server restarts, or your file-system is unmounted and mounted again. > > My patches will not work with the high-level file name based interface > (fuse.h) - it is impractical to implement the new NFS interfaces with > the file name based interface. > > John. > |