Re: [fuse-emulator-devel] Re: Problems with fuse 0.6.1 and 0.6.1.1

[Darren S. <ds...@yo...>]

I demand that Philip Kendall may or may not have written...

> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I demand that Philip Kendall may or may not have written...
>>> FWIW, this won't be a problem for any future versions of Fuse as they'll
>>> require a libgcrypt version >= 1.1.42.
>> That could pose a small problem. Maintaining support for 1.1.12 for at
>> least the next release may be worthwhile.
>>   <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/205081>
>>   <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/213820>

> IMO, they don't appear to be particularly relevant. With respect to
> #205081, the multi-threaded linking problem referred is apparently fixed in
> the latest CVS[1], and Werner Koch seems happy for 1.1.43 to be packaged.

This is good... it's really a matter of whether this makes it into sarge
(chances are that it will) and of when sarge becomes the stable distribution
(probably no earlier than the middle of next year).

> #213820 is just Debian-internal stuff (and only 8 days old. Give the guy a
> chance!)

What got my attention here was the word "experimental". I don't particularly
want dependencies on packages in experimental ;-)

[snip]
-- 
| Darren Salt                    | nr. Ashington, | RISC OS,
| ds...@yo... | Northumberland | Linux
| ds...@za...            | *Toon Army*    |
|   I don't ask for much, just untold riches...

The time is right to make new friends.