From: Eric S. <er...@sa...> - 2003-07-22 15:17:07
|
Mike A. Harris said: > Whatever is best for the freeglut project as a whole IMHO is what > you guys should aim for. Hopefully that helps Red Hat and/or > other distros out in their time schedules too, but I don't want > the project to feel pressured to meet any external deadlines. > > I'm sure whatever is decided, that we'll figure out something > that will be beneficial for all in the end. I'll have a better > idea of what flexibility I have in 2 weeks when I return. I > might end up having to personally compile/test tonnes of GLUT > stuff out there to show stability is ok, or something to bypass > cutoff dates then, but it's probably worth it in the long run > IMHO. > > Thanks John. So, shall we release what we have now as 2.0.0, have RH and the other distros update (those that will, anyways), and then have the menu fix for 2.0.1, plus any that the users of those distros (and possibly Mike if he has to do extensive testing) find? -sandalle -- PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61 http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61 Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer er...@sa... | http://www.sourcemage.org/ http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/ |