From: Diederick C. N. <dc...@gm...> - 2017-04-26 08:40:17
|
Hi John, On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:53 AM, John Tsiombikas <nu...@me...> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Please see the below. I see the difference as insubstantial. The text >> as it is, is a little odd though. Shall we just fix up that end >> sentence to read as the X11 license does? > > Purely legally speaking (and that's just my understanding, I'm not a > lawyer), to change anything other than trivial spelling mistakes in the > wording of the licence, we would need the consent of every copyright > holder, which for a project that doesn't do GNU-style copyright > assignment forms to a single entity, would be every contributor of > anything more than a couple of lines ever. You're probably right. I'll make a tiny change to the website then to not suggest its not a verbatim X11 license. Thanks! Dee |