From: Diederick C. N. <dc...@gm...> - 2012-03-16 06:01:59
|
Hi John, Thanks a lot for your feedback. Sadly, one of the arrays is of size [NUM_FACES][NUM_VERT_PER_FACE], so that's going to differ in both dimensions per shape. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 13:27, John Tsiombikas <nu...@me...> wrote: > 1 - squash your data to an 1-dimensional array and just access them like > this: foo[i * NUM_COLS + j], this is very commonly done for raster > images for instance. Yup, I have decided to go this way. Thank you very much, it was eductional for me! Best, Dee |