This is the main freeglut bug tracker. Issues opened elsewhere might not be seen by everyone involved with the project. What is inconvenient about this bug tracking system?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Yes, I agree that sourceforge is clunky, which is why I'm personally using github for most of my projects. But the sf bugtracker works fine, and since it's the official bugtracker for the time being, it's really where issues should be opened. Keeping them in one place makes sense.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dear Pablo,
We currently have 9 open issues on github, issue reporting there seems
to work fine. Is there some specific hurdle you're running into?
All the best,
Dee
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Pablo Rodriguez ousia@users.sf.net wrote:
Related
Feature Requests:
#90This is the main freeglut bug tracker. Issues opened elsewhere might not be seen by everyone involved with the project. What is inconvenient about this bug tracking system?
Hi John,
sorry, but I really don’t like it. It is far less clear and useful that GitHub (or Bitbucket, or GitLab).
But it seems that we agree on that 😉.
Many thanks for your reply,
Pablo
Yes, I agree that sourceforge is clunky, which is why I'm personally using github for most of my projects. But the sf bugtracker works fine, and since it's the official bugtracker for the time being, it's really where issues should be opened. Keeping them in one place makes sense.
Dear Dee,
yesterday I just checked it and it totally overlooked that issues where enabled (it seems I was too tired).
Sorry for the noise,
Pablo