From: jeroen <je...@fo...> - 2003-06-28 14:29:00
|
On Saturday 28 June 2003 07:49 am, you wrote: > Hi Jeroen, > > Fox uses plenty of enumerations (C-style enums) for what not: style > constants, selectors, message types, etc. > > My concern is, is it guaranteed that the integer values of these constants > will not change (for example, by inserting a new constant in the middle of > the enumeration) across Fox releases that have the same major & minor > number, i.e. do they stay the same across all Fox 1.0.X releases? In the even-numbered releases (1.0, 1.2, and so on) the header files will be, to the extent possible*, untouched. This provides DLL compatibilty. > I'm almost confident this is the case but since I found defferences betwe= en > the 1.1.X & 1.0.X branches, I need to know for sure whether at least with= in > the stable 1.0.X and the (soon to come?) 2.0.X branches there will be no > such changes. =46rom one even release to the next one (like upcoming 1.0 to 1.2) there are going to be API changes. Once 1.1 gells and becomes 1.2, I will then try and keep stuff the same for subsequent bug-fix updates. - Jeroen *) Sometimes, changes are needed for new target machines... =2D-=20 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D-+ | Copyright (C) 09:20 04/20/2003 Jeroen van der Zijp. All Rights Reserved= =2E | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D-+ |