From: Nick W. <bs...@ba...> - 2001-07-20 13:50:03
|
-- > I still have the opinion that FOX has a better general concept than GTK but > the following things have become more and more important: > - GTK has almost become the most popular Unix widget set, everyone has it, > QT is usually only available if KDE is in use I don't think that's true; you can install and use the Qt packages even if you aren't using KDE and they are standard with most distros. The main problem with Qt is the lack of a free edition for Windows - it is (to my mind) a well designed library. > and almost no one (!) has > FOX or FLTK or ... Are the distros aware of it? If so, I'm surprised it's not included more as cross-platform ability is obviously a useful thing to have... > - GTK might have a bad concept but GNOME's surrounding technologies are > evolving fast and are excellent: Bonobo, Pango... When I was looking into playing around with gui programming under Linux, I looked at GTK but it didn't seem half as conceptually "neat" as the C++ based toolkits. I guess it's taken off because "traditional" Unix people were used to programming in things like xt and motif; my first experience with GUI programming was actually the Java AWT so I've never known anything else other than object-orientated GUI programming. The other problem with GTK from what I gather is the lack of a stable version for Windows - I choose Linux as my main OS for programming but I don't want to shut windows users out. Nick W |