|
From: James T. <ja...@fl...> - 2022-02-15 14:17:28
|
> On 15 Feb 2022, at 16:05, Erik Hofman <er...@eh...> wrote: > > For one the x,y positions are off comapared to ShivaVG making things slightly bigger (maybe too big for the screen). That’s weird, we should make a test case and check back with the upstream, since I guess it’s supposed to be 1:1 compatible. But, very glad to hear it ‘kind of sort of’ works, that’s already less work than integrating NanoVG. Kind regards, James |