|
From: Stuart B. <stu...@gm...> - 2017-07-03 14:18:02
|
Hi All, On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:44 AM, David Megginson wrote: > I don't have an easy solution — even with our amazing team of volunteer > developers, I doubt we have the capacity to pull this off — but then I > wonder whether that means that the usefulness of FlightGear will also > gradually taper off. Maybe we'll be able to connect to external simulators > for these units, and just accept not seeing them in the 3D cockpit. I think there has been some development in this area for some time, but it's not clear how complete it is in terms of going beyond a PFD displaying basic flight information digitally. For example zakh on the forum has been developing a Garmin G1000 clone called the zkv1000: https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=32056 The DA-42 model uses some form of G1000 as well - which may be an older version of the zkv1000. I agree with John that this is something we need to address, as our GA aircraft will otherwise become more and more old-fashioned. I'm more optimistic than David - I think we _do_ have the capability to write this - for example just look at the complexity of the Shuttle model. I'd really love it if the c172p/c182 team were to develop a G1000-equipped variant of their aircraft. I suspect they are a tight enough team to achieve it, with perhaps some help from the Shuttle team who now have a huge amount of experience developing canvas displays. This is well outside my area of expertise, but I'd be happy to provide assistance if I can. -Stuart |