|
From: James T. <zak...@ma...> - 2016-11-14 20:30:18
|
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 20:21, Durk Talsma <dur...@gm...> wrote: > > Agreed. One thought just struck me, which is that we could incorporate a copy of the detailed weather subsystem server side, so that we could generate consistent weather across sessions, without the need to had that generated from within FlightGear. > > Having said that, it's probably good to take this one step at the time... :-) Yes that would be ideal. Whatever you do in this direction, please try to keep it able to run inside fgfs as a thread, as well as living in its own process. We can easily short-circuit the networking layer to efficiently pass messages between the threads. If you need help with accessing other data structures (eg ground elevation) just let me know. Kind regards, James |