|
From: Curtis R A. <gl...@gl...> - 2007-01-02 01:17:42
|
Paul Glanville wrote: > Hello All (and Happy New Year); > > I have encountered a slight problem with fix.dat, namely multiple instances of > entries in the range of "CATnn"... > > For instance CAT05 is near Sicily, as well as off the coast of El Salvador... > > Since I discovered this, I have found several other duplicates, for instance > CALDO, and CALIF. I have not done an extensive search, however; there are no > doubt many others.. I have indeed found other duplicates in the last DAFIF cycle released in the public domain. When I get back to the computer hosting the database where I keep fixes, I can check these. > I am curious (a) how this came to be, and (b) what I can do to rectify it... With my database and a PERL script, I retrieve all fixes (or NDBs or VORs) with the same name and by using great circle navigation routines, I select the one closest to the current point. -- Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still "In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..." http://www.gleepy.net/ mailto:gl...@in... mailto:gl...@gl... (and others) Yahoo!: gleepythehen |