Re: [Flashforth-devel] Assembling ff-pic18 with MPLabX problem

[craig b. <dab...@ya...>]

I downloaded & built  FlashForth 5 PIC18F46K22 13.06.2019
There's an appearant typo in line :
2535	        bcf     ANSELCNSC7, BANKED   ; Enable digital RC7 for RX
... which I edited to:
2535	        bcf     ANSELC, ANSC7, BANKED   ; Enable digital RC7 for RX
... to get it to assemble.  This build works although the PLL probably isn't running because it communicates at 9600 rather than 38400.

FlashForth 5 PIC18F46K22 13.06.2019

empty  ok<#,ram>
words
p2+ p++ pc@ @p hi d. ud. d> d< d= d0< d0= dinvert d2* d2/ d- d+ dabs ?dnegate dnegate s>d rdrop endit next for in, inline repeat while again until begin else then if until, again, begin, else, then, if, not, nc, nz, z, br? dump .s words >pr .id ms ticks s0 latest state bl 2- ['] -@ ; :noname : ] [ lst does> postpone create cr [char] ( char ' abort" ?abort ?abort? abort prompt quit true false .st inlined immediate shb interpret 'source >in tiu tib ti# number? >number a> >a ud/mod ud* sign? digit? find immed? (f) c>n n>c @+ c@+ place cmove word parse \ /string source user base pad hp task ulink bin hex decimal . u.r u. sign #> #s # digit <# hold up min max ?negate tuck nip / u*/mod u/ * u/mod um/mod um* 'key? 'key 'emit p+ pc! p! p@ r>p !p>r !p u> u< > < = 0< 0= <> within +! 2/ 2* >body 2+ 1- 1+ negate invert xor or and - m+ + abs dup r@ r> >r rot over swap drop allot ." ," s" (s" type accept 1 umax umin spaces space 2swap 2dup 2drop 2! 2@ cf, chars char+ cells cell+ aligned align cell c, , here dp ram eeprom flash c@ @ c! ! sp@ 2constant constant co: 2variable variable @ex execute key? key emit ver warm empty btfss, btfsc, bsf, bcf, bra, rcall, call, goto, br3 br2 as3 as1 rshift lshift ic, i, operator Fcy mtst mclr mset iflush pause turnkey is to defer value cwd u1- u1+ fl+ fl- >tblp literal int! ;i di ei scan skip n= rx1? rx1 tx1 i] [i andlw, movf, w, a, exit
marker  ok<#,ram>
  ok<#,ram>
  ok<#,ram>
-1.  ok<#,ram>65535 65535
+  ok<#,ram>65534
. -2  ok<#,ram>

Much better.  I'll continue testing.  It looks like I just had a bad copy of that older version.
Thanks again for your attention.
craig