Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Peter J. <pe...@me...>]

This prompted me to update the Quick Reference sheet.
https://bitbucket.org/pajacobs/flash-forth-docs/src
Caught up with the extended memory words as well.
The new PDF is dated 2017-03-28.

Cheers,
Peter J.


On 28/03/17 00:39, Pete Zawasky wrote:
> Thanks for the background info...   I will add this to my abort"   
> dictionary definition.
>
> Pete
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Mikael Nordman [mailto:mik...@fl...]
>     *Sent:* Monday, March 27, 2017 12:40 AM
>     *To:* fla...@li...
>     *Subject:* Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0 abort"
>
>     I did that to write bl word find abort" ?" instead of bl word find
>     0= abort" ?" There is also this case 2 1 3 within abort" ?" It
>     just seemed silly to put 0= in front of every abort". Also I think
>     it is more logical to abort on negative(= false) result. But yes,
>     it is not compatible with other forths. BR Mike On 2017-03-27
>     02:00, Pete Zawasky wrote: > It appears that at runtime, abort"
>     will print if flag is > FALSE . > Most FORTH documentation
>     suggests that abort" should print > if flag is TRUE .
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________ Flashforth-devel
>     mailing list Fla...@li...
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashforth-devel mailing list
> Fla...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel