Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Pete Z. <pza...@pz...>]

 Thanks for the background info... I will add this to my abort" dictionary definition. 

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Nordman [mailto:mik...@fl...]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 12:40 AM
To: fla...@li...
Subject: Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0 abort"

I did that to writebl word find abort" ?"instead ofbl word find 0= abort" ?"There is also this case2 1 3 within abort" ?"It just seemed silly to put 0= in front of every abort".Also I think it is more logical to abort on negative(= false) result.But yes, it is not compatible with other forths.BR MikeOn 2017-03-27 02:00, Pete Zawasky wrote:> It appears that at runtime, abort" will print  if flag is> FALSE .> Most FORTH documentation suggests that abort" should print > if flag is TRUE .------------------------------------------------------------------------------Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's mostengaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________Flashforth-devel mailing lis...@li...://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel