Re: [Flashforth-devel] Turnkey issues on restart not remembering
Brought to you by:
oh2aun
From: Mikael N. <mik...@pp...> - 2014-05-08 21:01:06
|
I recommend that you recompile FF with the SKIP_MULTITASKING option defined in the p18f-main.cfg And flash it to the chip. The Turnkey value in eeprom is at address hex ec00 BR Mike On 05/08/2014 11:16 PM, Simon Bradley wrote: > Mikael Nordman wrote: >> Simon, >> >> Does it failafter turnkey definition immediately in the first warm >> start ? > I have just tried both a warm restart with WARM and also power off and on > It worked this time around. I have an LCD display which I write text to > when the PIC starts up. I only notice the fault when the display doesn't > show the expected text and find that turnkey has been changed. > > the turnkey I use doesn't loop and exits back to the interpreter after running. > > >> Otherwise I cannot think about any reason except that your >> application corrupts the turnkey. >> >> One typical error scenario is return stack overflow which will write >> crap into the bottom of the parameter stack. >> Thus causing unexpected behaviour. > Not sure if that happens as programs seem to run correctly > >> Multitasking gives you more opportunities to overflow the return >> stack. >> Once in each task. > I haven't yet got into the multitasking scenario yet, so that probably > isn't it. (Still learning FORTH using this device :) > >> The PIC HW return stack is written to the user area in PAUSE even if >> you only run the operator task. Defining SKIP_MULTITASKING before you >> compile FF excludes this copying. >> >> You could also increase the RETURN_STACK_SAVE_SIZE to d'62'. >> It is a bit on the small side in the FF3.8 ! >> >> ; Max size is d'62' >> #define RETURN_STACK_SAVE_SIZE d'30' ; 15 cells return stack save area > Ok, that's currently beyond me ! > > Is there a way to check if the turnkey has been corrupted ? Is it stored > in the EEPROM and copied to RAM ? > > Is there a memory map I can refer to to help try and understand what is > going on? > >> BR Mike > Thanks for your help, > Simon. > > |