Re: [Flashforth-devel] FF5.0 on PIC24FV32KA302 -- a couple of issues
Brought to you by:
oh2aun
From: Peter J. <pe...@me...> - 2014-04-19 03:41:01
|
It works very nicely, thank you Mike. The PIC24FV32KA302 rev 4 chip transmits reliably only with the unbuffered option. The PIC24FV16KM202 works with the default buffered option, however, I've had to make a small edit to the include ff30.inc file to get the assembler to include the p24f16ka_config file. Surprisingly to me, this KM chip seems to be assigned to the __PIC24F family by the assembler. The most changes went into the p24f16ka_config file so that I could select the different chips via the MPLABX project properties, however, these don't amount to much. There are also another couple of small edits needed to the main ff-pic24-30-33.s file to accommodate these chips. I've put a complete copy of my current work tree at http://dropbox.eait.uq.edu.au/e4pjacob/flash-forth/ff5p0-pic24fv32ka-apr-2014.tar.gz if you would like to pick the changes out. Alternatively, should I make a patch against your git repository? I'm still doing something wrong with the PLL, but that is for another day. The unbuffered TX option allows me to continue at the moment. Cheers, Peter J. On 19/04/14 06:48, Mikael Nordman wrote: > Peter, > I just pushed a FlashForth without UART TX buffering. > > Could you test how it works ? > > BR Mike > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech > _______________________________________________ > Flashforth-devel mailing list > Fla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel |