Re: [Flashforth-devel] PIC32

[Mikael N. <mik...@pp...>]

Hej Anders
I once looked at it but the MIPS assembly was ugly.
You have to push and pop the return stack manually for each subroutine call.

But still its doable.

I don't think I have time to do it for quite a while.
I also need to do some other stuff than write new Forths :-)

If you want do it thats fine with me.

Anyone ?

Mike

On 03.03.2014 22:45, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> Is there any chance that someone on this list is interested
> in writing FF for the PIC32?
>
>
> Best regards,
> /anders
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
> Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Flashforth-devel mailing list
> Fla...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel
>