Re: [Flashforth-devel] FlashForth for Atmega128

[Mikael N. <mik...@pp...>]

The plan is to prevent all writes to the kernel area.
You should be able to reset the cpu and give the empty and warm
commands now matter how bad you screw up the system.

This is how it works on the PICs.

I did the tail call optimisation a few days ago.
The kernel write protection is next on the list.

Mike

On 8.12.2011 16:20, om1zz wrote:
>> - kernel write protection
> For example amforth is quite sensitive on overwriting the code, a
> reflashing the whole flash is a standard maintenance operation
> basically. It would be interesting to know how FF on avr will cope
> with that..
> I.