flashforth-devel

Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Pete Z. <pza...@pz...>]

 Thanks for the background info... I will add this to my abort" dictionary definition. 

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Nordman [mailto:mik...@fl...]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 12:40 AM
To: fla...@li...
Subject: Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0 abort"

I did that to writebl word find abort" ?"instead ofbl word find 0= abort" ?"There is also this case2 1 3 within abort" ?"It just seemed silly to put 0= in front of every abort".Also I think it is more logical to abort on negative(= false) result.But yes, it is not compatible with other forths.BR MikeOn 2017-03-27 02:00, Pete Zawasky wrote:> It appears that at runtime, abort" will print  if flag is> FALSE .> Most FORTH documentation suggests that abort" should print > if flag is TRUE .------------------------------------------------------------------------------Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's mostengaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________Flashforth-devel mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel

Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Peter J. <pe...@me...>]

This prompted me to update the Quick Reference sheet.
https://bitbucket.org/pajacobs/flash-forth-docs/src
Caught up with the extended memory words as well.
The new PDF is dated 2017-03-28.

Cheers,
Peter J.


On 28/03/17 00:39, Pete Zawasky wrote:
> Thanks for the background info...   I will add this to my abort"   
> dictionary definition.
>
> Pete
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Mikael Nordman [mailto:mik...@fl...]
>     *Sent:* Monday, March 27, 2017 12:40 AM
>     *To:* fla...@li...
>     *Subject:* Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0 abort"
>
>     I did that to write bl word find abort" ?" instead of bl word find
>     0= abort" ?" There is also this case 2 1 3 within abort" ?" It
>     just seemed silly to put 0= in front of every abort". Also I think
>     it is more logical to abort on negative(= false) result. But yes,
>     it is not compatible with other forths. BR Mike On 2017-03-27
>     02:00, Pete Zawasky wrote: > It appears that at runtime, abort"
>     will print if flag is > FALSE . > Most FORTH documentation
>     suggests that abort" should print > if flag is TRUE .
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________ Flashforth-devel
>     mailing list Fla...@li...
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashforth-devel mailing list
> Fla...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel

Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Eugene <en...@ni...>]

On 03/27/2017 05:39 PM, Peter Jacobs wrote:
> This prompted me to update the Quick Reference sheet.
> https://bitbucket.org/pajacobs/flash-forth-docs/src
> Caught up with the extended memory words as well.
> The new PDF is dated 2017-03-28.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter J.
Doesn't appear to have updated, still says 2016: "FlashForth 5 Quick 
Reference for PIC and AVR Microcontrollers. (2016)"

Re: [Flashforth-devel] ff5.0abort"

[Peter J. <pe...@me...>]

Eugene, I see.  The UQ library copy is the 2016 version.

The new PDF is in the bitbucket repository as this file.
https://bitbucket.org/pajacobs/flash-forth-docs/src/d9bc880b7f19ae993a73da517a28215de6beb0ba/pdf/flash_forth_5_quick_ref_2017_03_28.pdf?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default

I should update the README.md file to point to the most recent PDF.

Regards,
Peter J.


On 28/03/17 09:43, Eugene wrote:
>
> On 03/27/2017 05:39 PM, Peter Jacobs wrote:
>> This prompted me to update the Quick Reference sheet.
>> https://bitbucket.org/pajacobs/flash-forth-docs/src
>> Caught up with the extended memory words as well.
>> The new PDF is dated 2017-03-28.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter J.
> Doesn't appear to have updated, still says 2016: "FlashForth 5 Quick
> Reference for PIC and AVR Microcontrollers. (2016)"
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Flashforth-devel mailing list
> Fla...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flashforth-devel