I did that to write
bl word find abort" ?"
instead of
bl word find 0= abort" ?"
There is also this case
2 1 3 within abort" ?"
It just seemed silly to put 0= in front of every abort".
Also I think it is more logical to abort on negative(= false) result.
But yes, it is not compatible with other forths.
BR Mike
On 2017-03-27 02:00, Pete Zawasky wrote:
> It appears that at runtime, abort" will print <text> if flag is
> FALSE .
> Most FORTH documentation suggests that abort" should print <text>
> if flag is TRUE .
|