Re: [Fish-users] Fish-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 6
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
liljencrantz
|
From: Axel L. <lil...@gm...> - 2012-06-05 17:55:23
|
2012/6/5 Jan Kanis <jan...@ja...> > How have issues been tracked in the past with gitorious? How do people feel > >> about moving everything to github? >>> >> >> I'd like to hear answers to these questions, too. >> > > When the repo was converted from darcs to git while Axel was away, github > was discussed. The main reason gitorious was chosen was because it has > better facilities for project based development. On gitorious multiple > people can have full access to the fish repo, while on github (as far as > I'm aware) a repository is always owned by one person and other people can > only work on their own clones. > However, the lack of bugtracking and a wiki/documentation system sucks. > There hasn't been a lot of unified bugtracking the last few years. Some of > it was on the mailinglist, some on sourceforge, and some on fishshell.com. > So we clearly need one unified approach. > > These days, one can set up teams and give all team members write access to repos, so that's not really a problem. (anymore) Axel |