From: Paul R. <pr...@ib...> - 2001-05-22 09:38:03
|
John Bellardo wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure Windows has symlinks, just under a different name, maybe > aliases? The closest thing is to share a drive:\path across the network and then map it to a drive letter. Windows doens't care that the mapping is back to the same machine. But this doesn't achieve the same result as a symlink. Internally the full UNC path is often expanded. > I don't know where the headers exist on Windows installs right > now. Is there a /usr/include equivalent on Windows? If there isn't I > bet the issue has already been handled in one form or another. > I don't think any of the Windows platforms ship with headers. They come with the compiler. Paul -- Paul Reeves http://www.ibphoenix.com taking InterBase further |