From: Ann W. H. <aha...@ib...> - 2001-05-07 14:26:13
|
Hi guys! >This leads us into another debate: To use a little wrapper function, or >use a macro. I just grep'ed the sources and found 2042 sprintf's >(including the SS code). Maybe the performance hit is too much for a >wrapper function in the engine. It may be worth while to debate this >issue once (more?) and decide on a standard way to handle this. Have you checked ib_stdio.h? When we realized that we were limited to about 250 connections on Solaris by their byte-sized file id, we replaced stdio.h with our own. On most systems, it just brings in the system version. On Solaris, it brings in a reworked version of the BSD code. That might be a place to implement snprintf for systems that don't have it. >One (other) idea I've been kicking around lately is trying to move FB over >to use the autoconfig stuff. Sounds good. That's something I'd hoped to have done by last July. Regards, Ann www.ibphoenix.com We have answers. |