Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Question about implicit transaction support

[Carlos G. A. <car...@te...>]

Hello:

> I think this makes a lot of sense.
> 
> How does it work today? Is the command implicitly associated with the
> current pending transaction?

Now ( in version 1.5 ) a implicit transaction is started always when the 
command has no transaction assigned.



-- 
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain