Re: [Firebird-devel] HASH function (CORE-4436)

[Adriano d. S. F. <adr...@gm...>]

On 18/07/2017 16:48, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 18.07.2017 21:32, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> Would it make sense to reserve more bytes, 256 or 1024 octets for
>> example? Just to avoid extending the result every five years...
>
>   Just take care not to overflow index limit.
>
>

It will be described as VARCHAR, so real length depends on the algorithm
used by the user.


Adriano