|
From: Adriano d. S. F. <adr...@gm...> - 2016-05-20 12:48:12
|
On 20/05/2016 09:06, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > >>>> So if engine does not verify it, we should create a service specific for >>>> that: verify user names and passwords. Looks bad solution than initial >>>> one presented in this thread. >>> Engine _can_ verify login/password but this is not default for it. >>> Can FB/Java add to DPB, passed by user in attachDatabase, specific tag >>> (i.e. isc_dpb_validation_needed)? That will be enough. >>> >>> >> Do you talk about possible changes? >> >> I do not see isc_dpb_validation_needed in the code. >> > Yes. > Can the use of TYPE_AUTH_SERVER / TYPE_AUTH_CLIENT plugins have the same result as isc_dpb_validation_needed? Adriano |