|
From: Dmitry Y. <fir...@ya...> - 2012-11-19 16:09:11
|
19.11.2012 19:54, Ann Harrison wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Dmitry Yemanov <fir...@ya... > <mailto:fir...@ya...>> wrote: > > gbak -> fb_dump > nbackup -> fb_backup > > because IMO it better reflects their goals. > > Gbak is not equivalent to the MySQL or Postgres dumps which produce a > series of insert statements that can be edited. From my experience, > people expect textual output from a dump and will be > disappointed/annoyed to get our backup file. True. But perhaps some better idea could be suggested instead. Because I do think that semantically gbak is a [binary] dump utility for some special (read: rare) tasks while nbackup is what's intended to have fast backup/restore cycle (even leaving in piece its incremental capabilities). Dmitry |