Re: [Firebird-devel] PROPOSAL FB 3.0: Ditch the NONE as default charset

[Dmitry Y. <fir...@ya...>]

06.07.2012 11:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote:

> I am not sure I see why you would need to prohibit setting the
> characterset of a specific field when requiring the default characterset to
> be set. Could you explain the reasoning on that?

I believe his was referring to the default charset being set to e.g. 
UTF8 but some field would override it with NONE. I.e. it's only about 
NONE for fields, not about field specific declarations in general.


Dmitry